Publication Library / Publications
The burden of ovarian cancer in the USA from 2007 to 2018: evidence from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
Aim
To evaluate the economic and humanistic burden of ovarian cancer in the USA.
Methods
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data (2007-2018) were used to estimate all-cause healthcare resource use and costs for economic burden and examine the activities of daily living and quality-of-life (QoL) measures for humanistic burden between ovarian cancer patients and a non-cancer population.
Results
Compared with controls, patients with ovarian cancer had more comorbidities and worse QoL. Their predicted number of annual hospitalizations and office-based visits was significantly higher, as were their estimated annual all-cause total healthcare costs. Total costs were driven by hospitalization costs.
Conclusion
The study identified the burden of ovarian cancer and demonstrated that patients with ovarian cancer have greater healthcare resource use, higher costs and worse QoL than the non-cancer population. Future research is needed to develop strategies for managing ovarian cancers and inform decision-making to reduce disease burden.
Authors
E A Szamreta, W-J Wang, R Shah, S Corman, M Monberg
Journal
Future Oncology
Therapeutic Area
Oncology
Center of Excellence
Real-world Evidence & Data Analytics
Year
2023
Read full article