Services
Company
Legal and Governance
Publication Library / Publications
An innovative approach to modelling the optimal treatment sequence for patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: implementation, validation, and impact of the decision-making approach
Introduction
An innovative computational model was developed to address challenges regarding the evaluation of treatment sequences in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) through the concept of a ‘virtual’ physician who observes and assesses patients over time. We describe the implementation and validation of the model, then apply this framework as a case study to determine the impact of different decision-making approaches on the optimal sequence of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and associated outcomes.
Methods
A patient-level discrete event simulation (DES) was used to model heterogeneity in disease trajectories and outcomes. The evaluation of DMT options was implemented through a Markov model representing the patient’s disease; outcomes included lifetime costs and quality of life. The DES and Markov models underwent internal and external validation. Analyses of the optimal treatment sequence for each patient were based on several decision-making criteria. These treatment sequences were compared to current treatment guidelines.
Results
Internal validation indicated that model outcomes for natural history were consistent with the input parameters used to inform the model. Costs and quality of life outcomes were successfully validated against published reference models. Whereas each decision-making criterion generated a different optimal treatment sequence, cladribine tablets were the only DMT common to all treatment sequences. By choosing treatments on the basis of minimizing disease progression or number of relapses, it was possible to improve on current treatment guidelines; however, these treatment sequences were more costly. Maximizing cost-effectiveness resulted in the lowest costs but was also associated with the worst outcomes.
Conclusions
The model was robust in generating outcomes consistent with published models and studies. It was also able to identify optimal treatment sequences based on different decision criteria. This innovative modelling framework has the potential to simulate individual patient trajectories in the current treatment landscape and may be useful for treatment switching and treatment positioning decisions in RRMS.
Authors
M A Piena, S Kroep, C Simons, E Fenwick, G H Harty, S L Wong, B A Van Hout
Journal
Advances in Therapy
Therapeutic Area
Neurology
Center of Excellence
Health Economic Modeling & Meta-analysis
Year
2021
Read full article